<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425</id><updated>2011-10-11T06:57:22.281-07:00</updated><category term='Licensing'/><category term='Music'/><title type='text'>Entertainment Law Reporter</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>165</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-211195740497870606</id><published>2011-06-05T10:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-06-05T10:04:52.856-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Entertainment Law Reporter on hiatus</title><summary type='text'>I've discovered that publishing a one-man blog - even a blog that primarily calls attention to the fine work of others - is a surprisingly time-consuming activity. My work on the Entertainment Law Reporter got interrupted by the need to grade final exams and papers for my spring semester courses at Southwestern Law School, and then by my need to prepare to teach International Entertainment Law in</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/211195740497870606'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/211195740497870606'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/06/entertainment-law-reporter-on-hiatus.html' title='Entertainment Law Reporter on hiatus'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1533021675255693333</id><published>2011-05-02T11:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-05-02T11:25:51.799-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Donald, The Apprentice, the FCC, and the broadcast law issues if Trump runs for President</title><summary type='text'>Those who watch politics (the way others watch sports) wonder whether Donald Trump is seriously thinking about running for President, or whether he is simply generating publicity for his television show "The Apprentice." Only "The Donald" (and his hair dresser?) know for sure. But if he does decide to run, his candidacy will generate interesting legal issues. They are explained by David Oxenford </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1533021675255693333'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1533021675255693333'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/05/donald-apprentice-fcc-and-broadcast-law.html' title='The Donald, The Apprentice, the FCC, and the broadcast law issues if Trump runs for President'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2141457482781634521</id><published>2011-05-02T11:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-05-03T08:29:54.711-07:00</updated><title type='text'>FTC reports on compliance with entertainment industry age and content ratings</title><summary type='text'>The Federal Trade Commission has found that video game retailers enforce industry age and content ratings more vigorously than other entertainment retailers, and that music CD retailers are the most lax at doing so. In the words of the FTC:
Following an established trend, a Federal Trade Commission undercover shopper survey found that video game retailers continue to enforce most vigorously the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2141457482781634521'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2141457482781634521'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/05/ftc-assesses-of-compliance-with.html' title='FTC reports on compliance with entertainment industry age and content ratings'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4600843421262761763</id><published>2011-04-26T02:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-26T02:04:00.194-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Golden Gate IP Law Book Review</title><summary type='text'>The latest issue of The IP Law Book Review - an online periodical published by Golden Gate University School of Law - features reviews of:The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind, by James Boyle
Virtual Justice: The New Laws of Online Worlds, by Greg Lastowka
The Soul of Creativity: Forging a Moral Rights Law for the United States, by Roberta Rosenthal Kwall
Inherent Vice: Bootleg </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4600843421262761763'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4600843421262761763'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/golden-gate-ip-law-book-review.html' title='Golden Gate IP Law Book Review'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5686981901719104315</id><published>2011-04-25T02:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-25T07:43:43.614-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Social media legal issues for nonprofits</title><summary type='text'>Earlier this month, Pillsbury's Jim Gatto made a presentation at The Kreeger Museum in Washington, D.C., about the legal issues faced by nonprofit organizations when using social media. He spoke about the legal aspects of nonprofits' use of virtual goods, virtual currencies and gamification. And he illustrated his talk with slides that are online at Pillsbury's Virtual World Law Blog.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5686981901719104315'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5686981901719104315'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/social-media-legal-issues-for.html' title='Social media legal issues for nonprofits'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UukbWVP2x64/TbTPn6QvP7I/AAAAAAAABCk/FpUyDsFax-8/s72-c/Image1.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3285021685765826860</id><published>2011-04-25T01:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-25T01:57:00.451-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Fordham IP, Media &amp; Entertainment Law Journal</title><summary type='text'>The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media &amp; Entertainment Law Journal features these articles (in Volume IX Book 3):
Moral Rights and Supernatural Fiction: Authorial Dignity and the New Moral Rights Agendas
Not that There’s Anything Wrong with That: Imputations of Homosexuality and the Normative Structure of Defamation Law
Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3285021685765826860'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3285021685765826860'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/fordham-intellectual-property-media.html' title='Fordham IP, Media &amp; Entertainment Law Journal'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7642981644911579012</id><published>2011-04-22T04:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-22T04:37:00.079-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Trademark law in virtual worlds</title><summary type='text'>Theodore Max, a partner in the New York City office of Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton, has written a 42-page article titled Trademarks in the Veldt: Do Virtual Lawyers Dream of Electric Trademarks? For a law review article, it is packed with allusions to science fiction. The "Veldt" in the article's title is the title of a Ray Bradbury story - one of the first (a footnote indicates) to refer </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7642981644911579012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7642981644911579012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/trademark-law-in-virtual-worlds.html' title='Trademark law in virtual worlds'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VRguVMjN1VE/Tat4scGlP5I/AAAAAAAABCg/VSZaPSEDMxc/s72-c/SnowCash.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5108704294700272472</id><published>2011-04-22T03:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-22T03:47:00.246-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sonny Vaccaro gives keynote at Harvard Law School Sports Law Symposium</title><summary type='text'>Sonny Vaccaro has done a lot of things over the course of his storied sports career. He used to be a Nike and Reebok "sports marketing executive." He's been called the "godfather of grassroots basketball." These days he's described as a "student-athlete advocate" - a reference to his role as a consultant for the plaintiffs in O'Bannon v. NCAA. All of these things made him the logical choice for </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5108704294700272472'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5108704294700272472'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/student-athlete-advocate-sonny-vaccaro.html' title='Sonny Vaccaro gives keynote at Harvard Law School Sports Law Symposium'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1075920822323105488</id><published>2011-04-21T02:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-21T02:37:00.289-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Photographer Patrick Cariou wins infringement lawsuit against appropriation artist Richard Prince</title><summary type='text'>I've always been puzzled about why, exactly, one artist would think it's OK, let alone legal, to use the work of another artist without permission. But, strange as it seems, there are many artists who do think that - so many that there's a label for them. They're called "appropriation" artists; and Richard Prince is one of them. Prince used photographs from Patrick Cariou's book Yes Rasta, to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1075920822323105488'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1075920822323105488'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/photographer-patrick-cariou-wins.html' title='Photographer Patrick Cariou wins infringement lawsuit against appropriation artist Richard Prince'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-dM5gsEr_nhs/TatbTA1h04I/AAAAAAAABCY/yBKhMPu0Pdo/s72-c/YesRasta.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5033786600972006045</id><published>2011-04-21T01:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-21T01:15:00.229-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Fordham media and entertainment law articles</title><summary type='text'>The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal published these articles (in Volume IX Book 2):
Finding A Home for Orphans: Google Book Search and Orphan Works Law in the United States and Europe, by Katharina de la Durantaye
Twittergate: Rethinking the Casting Director Contract, by Carter Anne McGowan
Copyright Enforcement in the Cloud, by Marc Aaron Melzer
When and Where </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5033786600972006045'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5033786600972006045'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/fordham-media-and-entertainment-law.html' title='Fordham media and entertainment law articles'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4220814339574435229</id><published>2011-04-20T03:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-20T11:51:30.554-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Defamation lawsuit against online booksellers is dismissed</title><summary type='text'>Amazon, Barnes &amp; Noble and Books-A-Million have defeated a defamation lawsuit that complained about statements made on their websites by the print-on-demand publisher of a surprisingly-expensive book titled Barack Obama &amp; Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies &amp; Murder. The lawsuit was filed by a fellow named Dan Parisi who also sued the book's author, Larry Sinclair. The part of the case against </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4220814339574435229'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4220814339574435229'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/defamation-lawsuit-against-online.html' title='Defamation lawsuit against online booksellers is dismissed'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3187466839735776930</id><published>2011-04-20T01:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-20T01:35:00.243-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The legality of filming money for movies and TV programs</title><summary type='text'>Clearing props for use in movies and TV programs usually is a matter of copyright law, and sometimes trademark law too. When props include actual money, however, other laws come into play: those that prohibit counterfeiting. The question of whether it's legal to film currency has just been asked and answered, both north and south of the U.S.-Canadian border.
In the U.S., the question "Can I Film </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3187466839735776930'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3187466839735776930'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/legality-of-filming-money-for-movies.html' title='The legality of filming money for movies and TV programs'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2032594616517322939</id><published>2011-04-19T04:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-19T07:31:09.656-07:00</updated><title type='text'>FedEx Field must provide listening devices to hearing-impaired fans at Washington Redskins games</title><summary type='text'>The Americans with Disabilities Act requires FedEx Field to give assisted listening devices to football fans attending Washington Redskins games, a federal Court of Appeals has held. The recent decision in Feldman v. Pro Football is explained in a Client Alert posted by Proskauer Rose.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2032594616517322939'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2032594616517322939'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/fedex-field-must-provide-listening.html' title='FedEx Field must provide listening devices to hearing-impaired fans at Washington Redskins games'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4093645136955192381</id><published>2011-04-19T01:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-19T07:34:17.716-07:00</updated><title type='text'>UK guidelines on sale of Royal Wedding souvenirs</title><summary type='text'>Prince William and Kate Middleton will get married next week, in what surely will be deemed the wedding of the century. Many people will want souvenirs to commemorate the event, and the free market will respond by providing them. I mention this, because the British are quite imaginative about creating special-purpose IP laws. They've got one for the 2012 Olympics (called the London Olympics </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4093645136955192381'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4093645136955192381'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/uk-guidelines-on-sale-of-royal-wedding.html' title='UK guidelines on sale of Royal Wedding souvenirs'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5213/5531352917_a06c1046ce_t.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6751983561035732909</id><published>2011-04-18T03:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-18T03:51:00.292-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Warren Beatty retained rights to "Dick Tracy" by satisfying requirements of reversion clause</title><summary type='text'>Warren Beatty still owns the rights to the "Dick Tracy" character, a federal District Court has held. Beatty bought those rights years ago from Tribune Media and used them to produce and star in the movie "Dick Tracy." The Beatty-Tribune agreement provided that the rights would revert to Tribune, unless the actor (who is Annette Bening's husband) began principal photography on another movie or TV</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6751983561035732909'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6751983561035732909'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/warren-beatty-retained-rights-to-dick.html' title='Warren Beatty retained rights to &quot;Dick Tracy&quot; by satisfying requirements of reversion clause'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5638042768386653800</id><published>2011-04-18T01:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-18T01:52:00.388-07:00</updated><title type='text'>UK art law</title><summary type='text'>The latest issue of Private Client Issues is a special edition devoted to the arts. Published by the British firm Blake Lapthorn, the periodical features these articles:Charitable Giving by Authors and Scholars, by Alison Talbot
Taxation of Works of Art and Chattels, by Alison Craggs
Buying and Selling Works of Art - What are the Pitfalls?, by Lara Robson
Would Mrs Bennett Approve?, by Christine </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5638042768386653800'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5638042768386653800'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/uk-art-law.html' title='UK art law'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8025583001848348659</id><published>2011-04-15T04:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-15T04:21:01.186-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Entertainment lawyers have featured roles in new movie</title><summary type='text'>Rick Kurnit - name-partner in New York City's Frankfurt Kurnit Klein &amp; Selz - is featured in the new movie "POM Wonderful Presents: The Greatest Movie Ever Sold." The movie is the latest from "Super Size Me" filmmaker Morgan Spurlock. New York City lawyer Paul Brennan - Spurlock's own lawyer - also makes an on-screen appearance in his client's humorous documentary about product placement, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8025583001848348659'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8025583001848348659'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/entertainment-lawyers-have-featured.html' title='Entertainment lawyers have featured roles in new movie'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://img.youtube.com/vi/f9vu3dUMQ1s/default.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5587930138424867213</id><published>2011-04-15T01:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-15T01:48:00.368-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sports law</title><summary type='text'>The latest issue of Proskauer Rose's sports law newsletter Three Point Shot  features these articles:Still Teaching the World to Sing, CocaCola Scores in Dispute over Spanish Language Version of World Cup Anthem
Show Me the Money – Just Make Sure I Know the Risk
Accused Internet Pirate Sites Hung from the Yardarm</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5587930138424867213'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5587930138424867213'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/sports-law.html' title='Sports law'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WOCkkxBbkIg/TTpF2wYPkEI/AAAAAAAAA_I/HqtjV87-7u4/s72-c/ProskauerLogo_220x43.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5628445207754060158</id><published>2011-04-14T04:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-17T15:20:12.697-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Movie ticket prices and profits</title><summary type='text'>University of Sydney economists Nicolas de Roos and Jordi McKenzie have written Cheap Tuesdays and the Demand for Cinema. Their study is based on movie attendance patterns in Sydney, but their methods and conclusions look relevant world-round. The abstract:Many movie markets are characterised by extensive uniform pricing practices, hampering the ability to estimate price elasticities of demand. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5628445207754060158'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5628445207754060158'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/movie-ticket-prices-and-profits.html' title='Movie ticket prices and profits'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1691593096837187985</id><published>2011-04-14T01:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-14T07:52:39.098-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Art law</title><summary type='text'>Herrick Feinstein has published the Winter 2011 edition of Art &amp; Advocacy featuring these articles by Herrick attorneys Yael Weitz, Waffiyah Mian, Michael Kessel and Michael Zargari :New Shipping Requirements in Effect: The Art World Reacts
Holocaust Art Restitution Litigation in 2010
Bartering with Art - Tax Implications
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1691593096837187985'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1691593096837187985'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/art-law.html' title='Art law'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-58nsdYMnj6I/TPlSvBxBfII/AAAAAAAAA3A/_vVODOyh_Fk/s72-c/Herrick.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-763518671113331519</id><published>2011-04-13T04:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-13T04:48:00.309-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Songs in the public domain</title><summary type='text'>Former Copyright Office librarian Tom Nichols has written They Never Renewed: Songs You Never Dreamed Were in the Public Domain. Published by The BZ/Rights Stuff, Inc., the book contains:An Introduction that discusses Public Domain and how to safely use the information provided in the book; the heart of the book, which is a listing of 96 songs in the Public Domain written in the 50s and 60s and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/763518671113331519'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/763518671113331519'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/songs-in-public-domain.html' title='Songs in the public domain'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-x_ET04qkpiU/TaMyniya_EI/AAAAAAAABCQ/6SusGjxfkYs/s72-c/TheyNeverRenewed.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3574955735366992315</id><published>2011-04-13T04:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-13T04:21:00.870-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Hip-hop, copyright and culture</title><summary type='text'>U.C. Davis law professor Thomas W. Joo has written A Contrarian View of Copyright: Hip-Hop, Sampling, and Semiotic Democracy. The abstract:A dominant trend in intellectual property (IP) theory asserts that technologies such as digital copying enable individuals to resist the cultural dominance of the media industry. Under this view, individuals appropriate cultural material and “recode” it by </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3574955735366992315'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3574955735366992315'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/hip-hop-copyright-and-culture.html' title='Hip-hop, copyright and culture'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-9163638347301209735</id><published>2011-04-12T04:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-12T04:39:00.644-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Copyright Office to host roundtable on copyright protection for pre-1972 sound recordings</title><summary type='text'>The Copyright Office will host a roundtable on copyright protection for pre-1972 sound recordings on June 2, 2011, at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. It is possible that the roundtable will continue on a second day, June 3. The roundtable will be conducted to assist the Copyright Office in its study for Congress on the desirability and means of bringing sound recordings fixed before </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/9163638347301209735'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/9163638347301209735'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/copyright-office-to-host-roundtable-on.html' title='Copyright Office to host roundtable on copyright protection for pre-1972 sound recordings'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-378167457290453900</id><published>2011-04-12T04:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-18T14:20:55.407-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Is there a "hot hand" in NBA basketball?</title><summary type='text'>The end of the long NBA season is on the horizon, and that means that many people - including lawyers - will be watching more basketball. Some may feel guilty about stepping up their TV viewing, mistakenly believing that even the NBA Finals are just "games," and that serious law work ought to be given precedence. 
If you're among those who will be watching more and feeling guilty, you will be </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/378167457290453900'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/378167457290453900'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/is-there-hot-hand-in-nba-basketball.html' title='Is there a &quot;hot hand&quot; in NBA basketball?'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2830894108004374963</id><published>2011-04-12T03:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-12T03:04:00.086-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent decisions: right of publicity; copyright fees</title><summary type='text'>Loeb &amp; Loeb's IP/Entertainment Law Weekly reports on (and links to):
No Doubt v. Activision Publishing, in which a California Court of Appeal held that Activision's use of the likenesses of the members of the band "No Doubt" was not transformative, and thus upheld a lower court order that denied Activision's motion to dismiss the band's right of publicity lawsuit.
Zamoyski v. Fifty-Six Hope Road </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2830894108004374963'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2830894108004374963'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/recent-decisions-right-of-publicity.html' title='Recent decisions: right of publicity; copyright fees'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TOVuBg7l_QI/AAAAAAAAA0Q/zrh_eP_hYgI/s72-c/Loeb.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7577765126810933115</id><published>2011-04-11T15:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-11T15:38:51.128-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Digital music sampling</title><summary type='text'>Duke University Press has published Creative License: The Law and Culture of Digital Sampling by Kembrew McLeod, Peter DiCola, Jenny Toomey and Kristin Thomson. The book answers these questions:How did the Depression-era folk-song collector Alan Lomax end up with a songwriting credit on Jay-Z’s song "Takeover"? Why doesn’t Clyde Stubblefield, the primary drummer on James Brown recordings from the</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7577765126810933115'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7577765126810933115'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/digital-music-sampling.html' title='Digital music sampling'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RrFy7bp6bPw/TaOB5ip0hpI/AAAAAAAABCU/9eUnbwvMU1Y/s72-c/CreativeLicense.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4520809496352389996</id><published>2011-04-11T03:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-11T08:27:44.623-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Canadian tax credits for U.S. movie and TV productions</title><summary type='text'>Cassels Brock &amp; Blackwell has published An Overview of Canadian Tax Credits For Non-Indigenous Film and Television Production. From the Introduction to the 23-page document:Canada, often referred to as “Hollywood North,” continues as a leading innovator in the development and implementation of public sector incentives for film and television production. These incentives have stimulated a billion </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4520809496352389996'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4520809496352389996'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/canadian-tax-credits-for-us-movie-and.html' title='Canadian tax credits for U.S. movie and TV productions'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-X2L5DeGB6HE/TVGtNkxKzFI/AAAAAAAABAI/l77rnmzAo3M/s72-c/CasselsBrock.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5555931936464672599</id><published>2011-04-11T03:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-11T09:26:16.183-07:00</updated><title type='text'>NBC defeats "Biggest Loser" infringement claim</title><summary type='text'>The television series "The Biggest Loser" does not infringe the copyright to a treatment titled "Phat Farm/Fat Farm – A Weight Loss Adventure," a federal District Court has held. The court found that the NBC series is not substantially similar to the protectible elements of the treatment.
The court's decision is noted by Arent Fox and noted and linked to by Loeb &amp; Loeb.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5555931936464672599'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5555931936464672599'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/04/nbc-defeats-biggest-loser-infringement.html' title='NBC defeats &quot;Biggest Loser&quot; infringement claim'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-33EGmdHbJ5s/TaIwHIThJnI/AAAAAAAABCI/07NnHEF3_iQ/s72-c/BiggestLoser.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-336235860760243243</id><published>2011-03-18T02:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-18T02:17:00.215-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Peter Yu offers entertainment industry more convincing proposals for digital copyright reform</title><summary type='text'>It isn't often that an academic offers to help the entertainment industry with legal arguments. (The industry, after all, does have paid professional help.) But Drake University law professor Peter Yu says he's done just that. Yu is a highly-regarded professor of IP law and the Director of Drake's Intellectual Property Law Center, so he knows whereof he speaks. His latest article is titled </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/336235860760243243'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/336235860760243243'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/peter-yu-offers-entertainment-industry.html' title='Peter Yu offers entertainment industry more convincing proposals for digital copyright reform'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2215431750628811394</id><published>2011-03-17T02:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-17T02:04:00.261-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Jerry Seinfeld and wife's publisher defeat defamation and idea submission claims by cookbook author</title><summary type='text'>Jerry Seinfeld has defeated a defamation claim filed against him by Missy Lapine, the author of The Sneaky Chef: Simple Strategies for Hiding Healthy Foods in Kids’  Favorite Meals. At the same time, HarperCollins defeated Lapine's claim that it breached an implied contract by publishing Deceptively Delicious: Simple Secrets to Get Your Kids Eating Good Food written by Sienfeld's wife Jessica. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2215431750628811394'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2215431750628811394'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/jerry-seinfeld-and-wifes-publisher.html' title='Jerry Seinfeld and wife&apos;s publisher defeat defamation and idea submission claims by cookbook author'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-j-FhqT240F0/TX0wRLGEYCI/AAAAAAAABBo/kjydabL-hSU/s72-c/SneakyChef.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4111289009953991374</id><published>2011-03-16T01:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-16T01:25:00.742-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Patents in the music industry</title><summary type='text'>I've always thought of music as the quintessential copyright industry. Trademark law plays a role too, in connection with band and company names. But patent law? The connection between patents and music passed me by, as it apparently did others as well. In a post titled Patents in the Music Industry: An Underutilized Competitive Advantage, Bryan Jaketic, an associate in the Benesch law firm, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4111289009953991374'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4111289009953991374'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/patents-in-music-industry.html' title='Patents in the music industry'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-H7bik4gLFYc/TX0nCidf7_I/AAAAAAAABBc/z2SaFK0BNPo/s72-c/logo_benesch.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6976104398711077118</id><published>2011-03-15T01:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-15T01:05:00.235-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Righthaven copyright cases reviewed</title><summary type='text'>Righthaven LLC has filed hundreds of copyright infringement lawsuits against websites, bloggers and online forums, in little over a year. The lawsuits have spawned a website of their own, aptly titled Righthaven Lawsuits, where you can find countless links to case filings and news.
In a post titled The Righthaven Lawsuits: What is Fair Use of Online Publications?, Jeff Neuburger of Proskauer Rose</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6976104398711077118'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6976104398711077118'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/righthaven-copyright-cases-reviewed.html' title='Righthaven copyright cases reviewed'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2351042156600252729</id><published>2011-03-15T00:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-15T00:01:01.482-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Impact of digital technology on earnings of visual artists</title><summary type='text'>Thoughtful people are able to imagine consequences, with just a modest amount of information about causes. It's a sign of intelligence, and the reason that some folks succeed. On the other hand, it's better to have more data than less. And for those interested in the impact of digital technology on the earnings of visual artists, more data is now available - a great deal more. Martin Kretschmer </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2351042156600252729'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2351042156600252729'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/impact-of-digital-technology-on.html' title='Impact of digital technology on earnings of visual artists'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7757941820690823719</id><published>2011-03-14T02:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-14T02:44:00.260-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Court stops online streaming TV service</title><summary type='text'>ivi, Inc. is a Seattle company whose website homepage features a banner headline reading "Watch Live TV Online." Not free, mind you. A couple of pages into the sign-up process, the site reveals that the price is $4.99 a month. Still, that's less than cable or satellite TV service, and that must have been part of ivi's competitive business plan. I use the past tense, because a federal court in New</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7757941820690823719'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7757941820690823719'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/court-stops-online-streaming-tv-service.html' title='Court stops online streaming TV service'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-CZHxnA0HB5U/TX09r2OElwI/AAAAAAAABBw/Lm2kA2CScH8/s72-c/ivi.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6273313171400095271</id><published>2011-03-14T01:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-14T08:05:47.519-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Public TV and radio: the financial conundrum</title><summary type='text'>It costs money to produce programs for public TV and radio. But public broadcasters aren't at liberty to sell advertising the way commercial broadcasters do. Noncommercial broadcasters are bound by FCC underwriting rules, compliance with which is not an easy task.

A lot has changed in this area of the law, since I wrote about then-existing FCC rules back in 1984, in a two-part article titled </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6273313171400095271'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6273313171400095271'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/public-tv-and-radio-financial-conundrum.html' title='Public TV and radio: the financial conundrum'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8254620364244717262</id><published>2011-03-11T05:03:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-11T05:03:00.957-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Digital music consumers as unintended copyright infringers: the problem and a proposed solution</title><summary type='text'>Saint Louis University law school professor Yvette Joy Liebesman has written Downstream Copyright Infringers. Here is her description of the problem she has identified, and the solution she proposes:The advent of on-line music sales has been a boon to the recording industry as well as for musicians and the general public. Previously unknown artists have found new avenues to showcase their work, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8254620364244717262'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8254620364244717262'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/digital-music-consumers-as-unintended.html' title='Digital music consumers as unintended copyright infringers: the problem and a proposed solution'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-490596630842457655</id><published>2011-03-11T01:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-11T01:35:00.204-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent decision: 9th Circuit says "Betty Boop" is not a trademark</title><summary type='text'>Locke Lord's QuickStudy on Trademark Practice reports on (and links to) a recent decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that held that the image of the cartoon character "Betty Boop" is not a trademark, when used on merchandise whose customer appeal is the image itself. In commentary critical of the court's 2-1 decision, Thomas Casagrande, Michael Schulman and Paul Van Slyke point out </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/490596630842457655'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/490596630842457655'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/recent-decision-9th-circuit-says-betty.html' title='Recent decision: 9th Circuit says &quot;Betty Boop&quot; is not a trademark'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-XZDz89tkmqQ/TXbKr9MUuzI/AAAAAAAABBY/ZZkYuMzwYak/s72-c/BettyBoop.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6210309474415464227</id><published>2011-03-10T01:58:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-10T01:58:00.868-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Digital media music licensing</title><summary type='text'>David Oxenford and Rob Driscoll, of Davis Wright Tremaine, recently made a presentation to the Texas Association of Broadcasters about the business and legal issues that surround the licensing of music for use in digital media. In a post in the firm's Broadcast Law Blog, they've made available their presentation slides, a memo on the "Basics of Music Licensing in the Digital Media," and details </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6210309474415464227'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6210309474415464227'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/digital-media-music-licensing.html' title='Digital media music licensing'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4632698838286862451</id><published>2011-03-10T01:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-10T01:52:00.572-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Work-for-hire doctrine in the context of high-tech startups and virtual companies</title><summary type='text'>Jon Garon (of Hamline Law School) and Elaine Ziff (of Skadden Arps) have written The Work-Made-for-Hire Doctrine Revisited: Startup and Technology Employees and the Use of Contracts in a Hiring Relationship. Their point:Often, a copyrighted work is not created by one or even two authors but, instead, by a multitude of authors. Corporate brochures include text drafted by copywriters working in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4632698838286862451'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4632698838286862451'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/work-for-hire-doctrine-in-context-of.html' title='Work-for-hire doctrine in the context of high-tech startups and virtual companies'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6012471432101272278</id><published>2011-03-09T01:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-09T01:45:00.611-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Sports law updates: Dodgers owners' divorce; NBA buys Hornets; athletes' name rights</title><summary type='text'>Herrick Feinstein has published the Winter 2011 edition of its Herrick Quarterly Sports Update featuring these articles by Herrick attorneys Irwin A. Kishner, Barry Werbin and Matthew Pace:Not-So-Artful Dodgers
NBA Takes Possession of New Orleans Hornets
What's In a Name?
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6012471432101272278'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6012471432101272278'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/sports-law-updates-dodgers-owners.html' title='Sports law updates: Dodgers owners&apos; divorce; NBA buys Hornets; athletes&apos; name rights'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-58nsdYMnj6I/TPlSvBxBfII/AAAAAAAAA3A/_vVODOyh_Fk/s72-c/Herrick.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8580382829186026901</id><published>2011-03-09T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-09T14:24:13.025-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Predicting copyright fair use</title><summary type='text'>I've always thought that copyright's "fair use" factors are little more than a guide for lawyers to organize their arguments (and judges to organize their decisions). In my opinion, those factors are not a useful tool for successfully predicting, in advance, whether any particular use will be deemed fair or infringing. Loyola of Chicago law professor Matthew Sag has a different opinion. He thinks</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8580382829186026901'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8580382829186026901'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/predicting-copyright-fair-use.html' title='Predicting copyright fair use'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4753319966992586907</id><published>2011-03-08T01:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-08T01:26:00.537-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Brazilian court awards privacy damages to secondary character in book and movie based on a true story</title><summary type='text'>A Brazilian appeals court has awarded the equivalent of $6,000 to a secondary character whose privacy was invaded in the book and movie "Meu Nome Nao E Johnny" ("My Name Ain't Johnny"). The book's author and publisher had obtained the consent of the story's main character, but not from the character who sued and won. The case is noted by Brazilian entertainment lawyer Rodrigo Borges Carneiro in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4753319966992586907'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4753319966992586907'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/brazilian-court-awards-privacy-damages.html' title='Brazilian court awards privacy damages to secondary character in book and movie based on a true story'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-qtO1eH5hISQ/TXWvRldpsQI/AAAAAAAABBU/p02NVLMaXgw/s72-c/MyNameAintJohnnyLarge.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1748237953721552766</id><published>2011-03-07T01:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-07T01:45:00.262-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Harvard Journal of Sports &amp; Entertainment Law publishes new issue</title><summary type='text'>The latest issue of the  Journal of Sports &amp; Entertainment Law, published online by students at Harvard Law School, features these articles:

Political Recording of the Contemporary Celebrity and the First Amendment, by David Tan
Antitrust &amp; The Bowl Championship Series, by Nathaniel Grow
Caught in the Copyright Rye: Freeing First Amendment Interests from the Constraints of the Traditional View, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1748237953721552766'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1748237953721552766'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/harvards-journal-of-sports.html' title='Harvard Journal of Sports &amp; Entertainment Law publishes new issue'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-DonX2mFsnA8/TWk7xVXHIgI/AAAAAAAABBQ/CmFxIiFVzzI/s72-c/HarvardJ.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-632396935437652249</id><published>2011-03-04T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-04T01:00:07.014-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Copyright and political campaigns in Canada</title><summary type='text'>The intersection of copyright law and political campaigns in the United States has been noted twice before, here and here. Now, the unauthorized use of copyrighted works by political campaigns in Canada has attracted attention. David Kluft has posted Not Quite Fair Use: Canada's Fair Dealing Exception to Copyright Infringement in the Political Spotlight on Foley Hoag's Trademark &amp; Copyright Law </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/632396935437652249'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/632396935437652249'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/copyright-and-political-campaigns-in.html' title='Copyright and political campaigns in Canada'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-vYt2YBCxvls/TREGtTmNDaI/AAAAAAAAA8M/jBMimSoWoik/s72-c/FoleyHoag.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7735976225652217115</id><published>2011-03-03T01:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-03T01:17:00.388-08:00</updated><title type='text'>UK developments: TV product placement; sports</title><summary type='text'>In a post titled Ofcom Launches New Product Placement Logo, SNR Denton, in London, notes that Ofcom - the UK communications office - has just permitted, for the first time, product placements in UK-produced television programs.________
Scotland's Morton Fraser has published the latest edition of its Sports E-Bulletin, featuring these articles:Yellow Card or Just a Quiet Warning?
Liability for </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7735976225652217115'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7735976225652217115'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/uk-developments-tv-product-placement.html' title='UK developments: TV product placement; sports'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4376550323742071829</id><published>2011-03-02T02:54:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-02T02:54:00.501-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent developments in sports law</title><summary type='text'>The sports law group at Proskauer Rose has begun publishing the newsletter Three Point Shot, edited by Robert Freeman. The first issue features these articles:
Wrestlemania in Bedrock City
Tackle Football Players Beware, and
This is Not Your Grandfather's Protective Padding.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4376550323742071829'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4376550323742071829'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/03/recent-developments-in-sports-law.html' title='Recent developments in sports law'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-DzOis9_peFA/TWhQrVQVaRI/AAAAAAAABBM/u9imYTi2U0U/s72-c/Proskauer.bmp' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3318043566030106332</id><published>2011-03-01T02:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-01T02:52:00.183-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Privacy rights of biopic characters</title><summary type='text'>Boston lawyers Mark Fischer and Franklin Levy have posted an interesting article titled Privacy Rights and Celebrities: Truth, Fiction and Biopics on the DuaneMorris website. They ask:How much can real people be fictionalized in the movies? Two recent films make that point—The Social Network and All Good Things. Though these movies often blend truth and fiction, the legal implications that can </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3318043566030106332'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3318043566030106332'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/privacy-rights-of-biopic-characters.html' title='Privacy rights of biopic characters'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-2JAlNDr1XMM/TWhOQZG3lcI/AAAAAAAABBI/nM6LfstsCuk/s72-c/DuaneMorris.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8267170122496900906</id><published>2011-02-28T01:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-28T01:20:00.321-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Labor relations in Hollywood</title><summary type='text'>Jonathan Handel has just published a new book about labor relations in Hollywood. In Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age, Handel takes a close look at the WGA strike and SAG negotiations of 2007-2009, both of which swirled around the issue of compensation for Internet uses of movies and television programs. The book's description:It was a Hollywood meltdown. . . The </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8267170122496900906'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8267170122496900906'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/labor-relations-in-hollywood.html' title='Labor relations in Hollywood'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WfvI1Gk8tAE/TWagroDL3aI/AAAAAAAABBE/dLt-mBg70IQ/s72-c/HollywoodOnStrike.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1226453745011221687</id><published>2011-02-25T03:25:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-25T03:25:00.293-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Who owns interview quotes: subject or writer?</title><summary type='text'>The quotations in published interviews are valuable source material for journalists, book authors and film makers. But who owns their copyrights: the subjects who were quoted, or the writer who conducted the interview? That question has attracted recent attention on both sides of the U.S.-Canadian border. To the south, New York City lawyer Mark Fowler (of Satterlee Stephens Burke &amp; Burke) </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1226453745011221687'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1226453745011221687'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/who-owns-interview-quotes-subject-or.html' title='Who owns interview quotes: subject or writer?'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4617918706941133038</id><published>2011-02-24T02:03:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-24T02:03:00.465-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Roller derby's lessons for trademark and right of publicity law</title><summary type='text'>I remember watching roller derby on television with my grandmother, decades ago when I was just a young boy. Little did I know then that I would be a law professor some day, or that roller derby would have something to teach me about trademark or right of publicity law, both of which I have taught to students out of thick and heavy casebooks. Suddenly, up from the inside track (or would it be </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4617918706941133038'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4617918706941133038'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/roller-derbys-lessons-for-trademark-and.html' title='Roller derby&apos;s lessons for trademark and right of publicity law'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-T568vTIfGc0/TWWDeHm8KqI/AAAAAAAABBA/YI_NzpliVoI/s72-c/RollerDerbySkate.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7572890984849541358</id><published>2011-02-23T04:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-23T04:15:01.233-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Copyright reversion rights</title><summary type='text'>Reversion rights in copyright law are as complex as anything that tax law has to offer. Complex and dry. But currently a hot topic, because of the possibility that rights to sound recordings soon may revert to recording artists. For those who may be interested in the history of copyright reversion, Cambridge law professor Lionel Bently and Columbia law professor Jane Ginsburg have co-authored '</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7572890984849541358'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7572890984849541358'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/copyright-reversion-rights.html' title='Copyright reversion rights'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1145830795616921313</id><published>2011-02-22T01:28:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-22T01:28:00.399-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent decision: Roger Clemens defamation case</title><summary type='text'>The current issue of Loeb &amp; Loeb's IP/Entertainment Law Weekly Update reports on and links to a recent decision in McNamee v. Clemens. The case is a defamation lawsuit filed against baseball player Roger Clemens by his former personal trainer. The court denied Clemens' motion to dismiss the trainer's complaint, because - the court held - statements Clemens made at press conferences and other </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1145830795616921313'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1145830795616921313'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/recent-decision-roger-clemens.html' title='Recent decision: Roger Clemens defamation case'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TOVuBg7l_QI/AAAAAAAAA0Q/zrh_eP_hYgI/s72-c/Loeb.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6875201164065771744</id><published>2011-02-18T01:58:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-18T01:58:00.796-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Hart on Copyright</title><summary type='text'>Terry Hart has posted two articles on copyright law in his Copyhype blog:
In The Reverse Class Action Lawsuit: Challenges of Enforcing Copyright Online, he looks at the strategy behind a lawsuit that's been filed by an adult film producer against a class of alleged infringers. You read that right: class actions usually are cases filed by a class of plaintiffs against a single defendant; this case</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6875201164065771744'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6875201164065771744'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/hart-on-copyright.html' title='Hart on Copyright'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1694186693914995333</id><published>2011-02-17T03:48:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-17T03:48:00.477-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The future of music</title><summary type='text'>The future of music - and especially the future of record companies - is an endlessly fascinating topic. Brian Day, an associate at Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe, has put his thoughts in writing in an article in the Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law titled In Defense of Copyright: Creativity, Record Labels, and the Future of Music. The abstract:As music production and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1694186693914995333'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1694186693914995333'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/future-of-music.html' title='The future of music'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1094189763619160661</id><published>2011-02-16T05:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-16T05:04:00.156-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Ex-boyfriend is ordered not to post nude photos of "Jersey Shore" star Jenni Farely</title><summary type='text'>"Jersey Shore" star Jenni Farley once told her then-boyfriend that she wanted to pose naked in Playboy magazine; and, he says, she allowed him to take nude photos of her. That was then, though. Now, they're no longer a couple. And she doesn't want him to sell the photos he took, to anyone. A judge in New York has granted her wish and has enjoined Jenni's ex from doing anything with the photos. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1094189763619160661'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1094189763619160661'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/ex-boyfriend-is-ordered-not-to-post.html' title='Ex-boyfriend is ordered not to post nude photos of &quot;Jersey Shore&quot; star Jenni Farely'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WaoOk0sHmWA/TVSKw-kHuaI/AAAAAAAABAU/h9LsY6WW-Wk/s72-c/JerseyShore.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3951010916856128590</id><published>2011-02-15T04:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-15T04:35:00.229-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Online copyright registration</title><summary type='text'>The United States Copyright Office has introduced online copyright registration. Beverly Hills entertainment lawyer Mark Litwak explains how to register the copyrights to films and scripts using the Copyright Office's new ECO system ("ECO" for Electronic Copyright Office), and he provides the link for doing so. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3951010916856128590'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3951010916856128590'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/online-copyright-registration.html' title='Online copyright registration'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3221385978307487330</id><published>2011-02-14T00:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-14T07:44:45.487-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Washington state right of publicity statute is declared unconstitutional in Jimi Hendrix case</title><summary type='text'>A federal judge in the state of Washington has declared the Washington State Publicity Rights Act unconstitutional, in a case filed by the estate of Jimi Hendrix against an unlicensed seller of Hendrix merchandise. Eriq Gardner explains (and links to) the decision at THR, Esq. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3221385978307487330'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3221385978307487330'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/washington-state-right-of-publicity.html' title='Washington state right of publicity statute is declared unconstitutional in Jimi Hendrix case'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PBMmNzmQPFQ/TVg6u3Q2DJI/AAAAAAAABAY/kYt-MNlNrcw/s72-c/JimiHendrix.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8804695720099107061</id><published>2011-02-11T02:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-16T15:18:46.502-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Fictional trademarks: protectable?</title><summary type='text'>"Duff Beer" is the trademark for the beer favored by "Homer Simpson." Just as "Homer" is a fictional character, "Duff Beer" is a fictional trademark. But does that mean that "Duff Beer" isn't protectable - that anyone may use the mark for anything? Fordham law student Benjamin Arrow tackles this question in Real-Life Protection for Fictional Trademarks in the latest issue of the Fordham </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8804695720099107061'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8804695720099107061'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/fictional-trademarks-protectable.html' title='Fictional trademarks: protectable?'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-B3dr4Gvw-E4/TVRrleLKgMI/AAAAAAAABAQ/j-4JKraVxVM/s72-c/Simpsons.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7210326131341493534</id><published>2011-02-10T01:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-10T01:04:00.666-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Trademark law in the movie/TV business</title><summary type='text'>Leonard Glickman of Cassels Brock in Toronto is writing a series of articles on trademark law issues that arise in the movie and television business. The first article was What's in a Title about trademark rights in titles. The second is Trade-marks and product placement: the use of branded products in film and television productions.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7210326131341493534'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7210326131341493534'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/trademark-law-in-movietv-business.html' title='Trademark law in the movie/TV business'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TVGtsTMnjvI/AAAAAAAABAM/uq1LVYURhdM/s72-c/CasselsBrock.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4528143740756137635</id><published>2011-02-09T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-09T01:00:01.263-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Music festivals and the law</title><summary type='text'>Summer is just over the horizon, and when summer arrives, music festivals do too. To the uninitiated, festivals may seem less formal than headliner-focused concerts. And less formality means that lawyers have less to think about . . . or do they? Actually, music festivals require a lot of legal planning, as San Francisco lawyer Richard Idell explains in an article titled simply Venues: Festivals </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4528143740756137635'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4528143740756137635'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/music-festivals-and-law.html' title='Music festivals and the law'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TVGclAYbcxI/AAAAAAAABAE/e-yYajBoYjQ/s72-c/Idell.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7250458234997057350</id><published>2011-02-08T03:50:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-08T03:50:00.270-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Buying a Major League Baseball team in bankruptcy</title><summary type='text'>The Chicago Cubs and the Texas Rangers both were purchased out of bankruptcy. How exactly this was done is explained by Marc Roitman of Chadbourne &amp; Parke in Going, Going, Gone: Selling the Cubs and Rangers in Bankruptcy.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7250458234997057350'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7250458234997057350'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/buying-major-league-baseball-team-in.html' title='Buying a Major League Baseball team in bankruptcy'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6127480224122556853</id><published>2011-02-07T03:08:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-07T03:08:00.376-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent privacy decision: Van Morrison v News of the World</title><summary type='text'>The UK law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain reports on (and links to) a recent ruling in Northern Ireland in which Van Morrison was granted an injunction against the News of the World that barred the newspaper from publishing information it apparently got from a tradesman who did work in the musician's home.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6127480224122556853'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6127480224122556853'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/recent-privacy-decision-van-morrison-v.html' title='Recent privacy decision: Van Morrison v News of the World'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6233521078505783520</id><published>2011-02-07T02:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-07T02:43:00.595-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Theater-provided hearing aids for the deaf: required by the ADA?</title><summary type='text'>In an article title Movie, Concert, and Performing Arts Theaters Beware of Possible ADA Lawsuit, Martin Orlick of Jeffers Mangels Butler &amp; Mitchell answers the question: "Should theaters provide personal hearing devices for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing?"</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6233521078505783520'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6233521078505783520'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/theater-provided-hearing-aids-for-deaf.html' title='Theater-provided hearing aids for the deaf: required by the ADA?'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1035953279829871596</id><published>2011-02-04T18:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-04T18:35:24.668-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Online copyright enforcement</title><summary type='text'>Is Online Copyright Enforcement Scalable? University of Idaho law professor Annemarie Bridy asks and answers that question in a new article that . . . examines peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing and the copyright enforcement problem it has created through the lens of scalability. Writing about the growth and governance of the Internet, David Post observed that "scaling problems - the problems that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1035953279829871596'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1035953279829871596'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/online-copyright-enforcement.html' title='Online copyright enforcement'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8476266655559487067</id><published>2011-02-03T01:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-03T17:57:08.382-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Irreparable harm as the standard for copyright injunctions</title><summary type='text'>Andrew Spillane, a Marquette law student, explores The Continuing Vitality of the Presumption of Irreparable Harm in Copyright Cases in his school's Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review. His point:Property has long enjoyed civil enforcement through a potent remedy: the permanent injunction. For decades, federal courts across the country roundly granted permanent relief upon finding </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8476266655559487067'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8476266655559487067'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/irreparable-harm-as-standard-for.html' title='Irreparable harm as the standard for copyright injunctions'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1979631249559418495</id><published>2011-02-03T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-03T01:00:13.852-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Radio music royalties: what price?</title><summary type='text'>Those interested in an economist's view of how to determine what music royalties radio stations should pay will find it in Fair Copyright Remuneration: The Case of Music Radio. The author, Richard Watt, is a professor of economics and finance at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, though his article was prompted by recent radio royalty debates outside - as well as inside - his home </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1979631249559418495'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1979631249559418495'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/radio-music-royalties-what-price.html' title='Radio music royalties: what price?'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6067070242924059382</id><published>2011-02-02T01:53:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-02T01:53:00.534-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Expanding and overlapping intellectual property protection: natural or problematic?</title><summary type='text'>I've never been troubled by the fact that some things - Mickey Mouse and Superman, for example - are protected both by copyright law and by trademark law. Some things have dual functions, so for me it was completely natural that one of their functions would be protected by one type of IP law while the other function would be protected by another. Not everyone shares that simple view, though. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6067070242924059382'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6067070242924059382'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/02/expanding-and-overlapping-intellectual.html' title='Expanding and overlapping intellectual property protection: natural or problematic?'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-484600694922559399</id><published>2011-02-01T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-01T11:17:40.834-08:00</updated><title type='text'>New book on the future of digital copyright</title><summary type='text'>Oxford University Press has published a new book by Zohar Efroni, of Stanford's Center for Internet and Society, titled Access-Right: The Future of Digital Copyright Law. The publisher's description:Copyright law has become the subject of general concerns that reach beyond the limited circles of specialists and prototypical rights-holders. The role, scope and effect of copyright mechanisms </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/484600694922559399'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/484600694922559399'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/new-book-on-future-of-digital-copyright.html' title='New book on the future of digital copyright'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TUYCJiD73CI/AAAAAAAAA_w/skU8cbtFeps/s72-c/FutureDigitalCopyright.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7893301138328117458</id><published>2011-01-31T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-31T01:00:03.196-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent thoughts on European copyright</title><summary type='text'>Columbia law professor Jane Ginsburg has written European Copyright Code - Back to First Principles (with Some Additional Detail). In her abstract, she explains:The "Wittem Group" of copyright scholars has proposed a "European Copyright Code," to "serve as an important reference tool for future legislatures at the European and national levels." Because, notwithstanding twenty years of Directives </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7893301138328117458'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7893301138328117458'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/recent-thoughts-on-european-copyright.html' title='Recent thoughts on European copyright'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6569804129832929577</id><published>2011-01-28T02:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-28T15:05:16.518-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" does not infringe the copyright to "The Adventures of Willy the Wizard"</title><summary type='text'>United States District Judge Shira Scheindlin has found that Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, the fourth book in the Harry Potter series written by J.K. Rowling, is not substantially similar to an illustrated childrens book titled The Adventures of Willy the Wizard - No 1 Livid Land by the late Adrian Jacobs. As a result, Judge Scheindlin has granted a defense motion to dismiss the case </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6569804129832929577'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6569804129832929577'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/harry-potter-and-goblet-of-fire-does.html' title='&quot;Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire&quot; does not infringe the copyright to &quot;The Adventures of Willy the Wizard&quot;'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TUH4jRGMJcI/AAAAAAAAA_o/44yW9yNheFw/s72-c/HarryPotter.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2845150808335715547</id><published>2011-01-27T02:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-27T09:07:32.479-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Celebrity endorsements, impersonations and image rights; online copyright infringement claims</title><summary type='text'>Heenan Blaikie's Entertainment &amp; Media Law Signal features several interesting posts:Online Celebrity Endorsements in Canada, the US, and the UK
Prohibiting Online Celebrity Impersonations - California and Canada
Company Buys Marilyn Monroe's Image Rights - But for How Long?
Canadian Conference of the Arts' "Status of the Artist in Canada" Report
Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2845150808335715547'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2845150808335715547'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/celebrity-endorsements-impersonations.html' title='Celebrity endorsements, impersonations and image rights; online copyright infringement claims'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TQlZvhavgsI/AAAAAAAAA7o/YpFwboTfNmo/s72-c/Blogosphere.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5373787031634470634</id><published>2011-01-26T02:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-26T02:00:00.747-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent decisions: "Don't Mess with Zohan" attorneys' fees; Copyright Act's written memo requirement</title><summary type='text'>The January 19, 2011, edition of Loeb &amp; Loeb's IP/Entertainment Law Weekly Case Update for Motion Picture and Television Networks reports on (and links to) two recent copyright decisions of interest:Cabell v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, in which a federal District Court in New York City awarded the producers of "You Don't Mess with the Zohan" only $1,000 in attorneys fees, because of the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5373787031634470634'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5373787031634470634'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/recent-decisions-dont-mess-with-zohan.html' title='Recent decisions: &quot;Don&apos;t Mess with Zohan&quot; attorneys&apos; fees; Copyright Act&apos;s written memo requirement'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TOVuBg7l_QI/AAAAAAAAA0Q/zrh_eP_hYgI/s72-c/Loeb.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1071059792135675246</id><published>2011-01-26T01:02:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-26T09:49:18.330-08:00</updated><title type='text'>European Court of Human Rights considers conflict between privacy rights and press freedom in Naomi Campbell and Max Mosely cases</title><summary type='text'>The European Court of Human Rights began the new year by considering the conflict between the right to privacy and freedom of the press, in two separate cases. On January 11, 2011, it issued its written decision in a case involving super-model Naomi Campbell. That same day, it heard oral argument in a case involving Max Mosely, the former president of the Formula One auto racing organization.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1071059792135675246'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1071059792135675246'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/european-court-of-human-rights.html' title='European Court of Human Rights considers conflict between privacy rights and press freedom in Naomi Campbell and Max Mosely cases'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TTzElnpKZ0I/AAAAAAAAA_Q/lAMbwmaCqAQ/s72-c/EurCtHumanRts.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4117723006308800961</id><published>2011-01-25T01:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-25T09:27:35.056-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Screenwriter ordered to pay $900,000 to "Monster in Law" producers, after they defeated her copyright infringement claim</title><summary type='text'>The producers of the Jennifer Lopez/Jane Fonda movie "Monster in Law," have emerged victorious from a lawsuit that alleged that the movie infringed the copyright to a screenplay titled "When Mom Is the Other Woman" written by Sheri Gilbert. The defendants' victory goes considerably beyond defeating  Gilbert's copyright infringement claim. It includes an order that requires Gilbert to pay the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4117723006308800961'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4117723006308800961'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/screenwriter-ordered-to-pay-900000-to.html' title='Screenwriter ordered to pay $900,000 to &quot;Monster in Law&quot; producers, after they defeated her copyright infringement claim'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TTyx_7AJObI/AAAAAAAAA_M/CwjLnKXwuQc/s72-c/Monster-in-Law.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-822334517012301325</id><published>2011-01-25T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-25T01:00:01.948-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Payroll company not joint employer of crew member employed by tv production company</title><summary type='text'>The latest issue of Proskauer's California Employment Law Notes notes that in Futrell v. Payday Cal., Inc., the California Court of Appeal has held that Reactor Films' payroll company, Payday California, was not a joint employer of crew members who worked for Reactor, a TV commercial production company. This meant that the payroll company was not liable to crew members who alleged they had not </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/822334517012301325'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/822334517012301325'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/payroll-company-not-joint-employer-of.html' title='Payroll company not joint employer of crew member employed by tv production company'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TTpF2wYPkEI/AAAAAAAAA_I/s6tPFaoRVaw/s72-c/ProskauerLogo_220x43.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3697912537362844687</id><published>2011-01-24T02:16:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-24T02:16:00.140-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Workers comp for pro athletes; criticism of Bowl Championship Series</title><summary type='text'>Arent Fox has posted three articles of interest to sports lawyers (and law students looking for seminar or law review topics):Professional Sports: Which Rules Apply When the Action Moves to the  Courtroom?, by Stewart Manela, is a good introduction to the question of whether professional athletes are entitled to workers compensation benefits under state law. That question has produced a lot of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3697912537362844687'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3697912537362844687'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/workers-comp-for-pro-athletes-criticism.html' title='Workers comp for pro athletes; criticism of Bowl Championship Series'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TToEzYxDsJI/AAAAAAAAA_A/gvUpph5Nauk/s72-c/arent_fox_logo.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1684037771844150507</id><published>2011-01-24T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-24T01:00:03.143-08:00</updated><title type='text'>k.d. lang wins case against former manager</title><summary type='text'>A British Columbia Court of Appeal has enforced a $1.9 million default judgment that recording artist k.d. lang obtained in a breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit she filed against her former manager in California. A report about (and link to) the Canadian court's decision has been posted by Peter Roberts of Lawson Lundell in Vancouver. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1684037771844150507'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1684037771844150507'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/kd-lang-wins-case-against-former.html' title='k.d. lang wins case against former manager'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TTn3uOADJUI/AAAAAAAAA-8/RZXro73lK9U/s72-c/LawsonLundell.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2031988246662144109</id><published>2011-01-21T02:34:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-21T02:34:00.436-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Copyright in works created by employees, in the U.S., Germany and Colombia</title><summary type='text'>Ownership of Copyright in Works Created in Employment Relationships: Comparative Study of the Laws of Colombia, Germany and the United States of America, by Jose Roberto Herrara Diaz, has been published (in English) by Revista la Propiedad Inmaterial. From the abstract:The ownership of . . . works [created by employees] has been regulated in different ways by the national laws of each country, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2031988246662144109'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2031988246662144109'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/copyright-in-works-created-by-employees.html' title='Copyright in works created by employees, in the U.S., Germany and Colombia'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8676857075154816654</id><published>2011-01-21T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-21T01:00:03.253-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Domain name seizures - the debate continues</title><summary type='text'>One of the great things about online publication - as contrasted with printed law reviews - is that debates can happen in real time. Case in point: the debate about the legality the seizure of the domain names of websites that are used to distribute copyright-protected works, without being licensed to do so. Terry Hart responded to criticisms of such seizures, quite persuasively I thought, in a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8676857075154816654'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8676857075154816654'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/domain-name-seizures-debate-continues.html' title='Domain name seizures - the debate continues'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7290521896556323795</id><published>2011-01-20T02:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-20T02:00:05.892-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Libel tourism": the British provocation and the American response</title><summary type='text'>London has been called the "libel capital" of the world and a "libel tourism" destination. I mentioned this last month, as an introduction to comments about a recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that chips away at the advantages of filing defamation suits in London, and a 2010 statute passed by Congress designed to negate that advantage entirely. Now, for those who'd like </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7290521896556323795'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7290521896556323795'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/libel-tourism-british-provocation-and.html' title='&quot;Libel tourism&quot;: the British provocation and the American response'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4082826596833337917</id><published>2011-01-20T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-20T08:52:23.155-08:00</updated><title type='text'>European Commission recommends copyright registration</title><summary type='text'>The Pinsent Masons blog Out-Law.com notes (and links to) a 45-page European Commission report that recommends that copyright owners register their rights with the EU, in order to avoid the creation of "orphan works." How ironic is that? Europeans (and others) criticized the United States for decades, because U.S. law required copyright registration until the U.S. joined the Berne Convention and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4082826596833337917'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4082826596833337917'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/european-commission-recommends.html' title='European Commission recommends copyright registration'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-4631809541370709106</id><published>2011-01-19T04:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-19T08:17:11.017-08:00</updated><title type='text'>College coaches, pro coaches, law and lawyers</title><summary type='text'>Dan Fitzgerald, at the Connecticut Sports Law blog, explains why When the NCAA Calls, Coaches Need Personal Counsel.
The Sports Law Blog calls attention to the publication of Advancing the Ball: Race, Reformation, and the Quest for Equal Coaching Opportunity in the NFL, a new book by Temple law professor N. Jeremi Duru.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4631809541370709106'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/4631809541370709106'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/college-coaches-pro-coaches-law-and.html' title='College coaches, pro coaches, law and lawyers'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TQlZvhavgsI/AAAAAAAAA7o/YpFwboTfNmo/s72-c/Blogosphere.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5832953017934965060</id><published>2011-01-19T03:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-19T03:30:00.839-08:00</updated><title type='text'>More on the "World of Warcraft" play-by-bot case</title><summary type='text'>The Ninth Circuit's decision in MDY v. Blizzard Entertainment - the "World of Warcraft" play-by-bot case - is a comment magnet. In addition to those noted earlier (here and here), these are the latest:Terra Nova (linking to still others)
Foley &amp; Hoag's Trademark &amp; Copyright Law (Part 1) (Part 2)
Proskauer's New Media &amp; Technology Blog (Part 1) (Part 2)
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5832953017934965060'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5832953017934965060'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/more-on-world-of-warcraft-play-by-bot.html' title='More on the &quot;World of Warcraft&quot; play-by-bot case'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TROLd7XWbjI/AAAAAAAAA94/uPMK4h-yuAo/s72-c/WorldOfWarcraft2.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1906562066421218382</id><published>2011-01-18T04:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-18T04:24:00.692-08:00</updated><title type='text'>New edition of Harold Vogel's "Entertainment Industry Economics" now available</title><summary type='text'>Cambridge University Press has just published a new edition - the 8th - of Harold Vogel's Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis. The book has long been an essential text for those who have wanted to understand the economics behind the business, lawyers included. According to the publisher, this new edition - which weighs in at 680 pages - differs from its predecessors </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1906562066421218382'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1906562066421218382'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/new-edition-of-harold-vogels.html' title='New edition of Harold Vogel&apos;s &quot;Entertainment Industry Economics&quot; now available'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TS-aEPr3oOI/AAAAAAAAA-k/srNeZn_-rNk/s72-c/Vogel+book.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3107654035393494309</id><published>2011-01-18T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-18T01:00:05.308-08:00</updated><title type='text'>First Sale Doctrine authorizes sale of promotional music CDs</title><summary type='text'>The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the U.S. Copyright Act's "First Sale Doctrine" permits the sale of promotional music CDs on eBay and elsewhere, even over the objections of the record companies that distribute those CDs and own their copyrights. The court's recent decision in UMG Recordings v. Augusto is noted (and linked to) by Eriq Gardner at The Hollywood Reporter's blog, THR, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3107654035393494309'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3107654035393494309'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/first-sale-doctrine-authorizes-sale-of.html' title='First Sale Doctrine authorizes sale of promotional music CDs'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6510350661509143834</id><published>2011-01-14T02:02:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-14T14:15:25.249-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Christo; transfer taxes; the Super Bowl; and Congress</title><summary type='text'>Sheppard Mullin's Art Law Gallery Blog features:"Over the River" and into the Legal Fray: Christo and Jeanne-Claude, and
The Art of Taxes: Major Changes to the Federal Transfer Tax System.
In Davis Wright Tremaine's Broadcast Law Blog:
David Silverman notes that "Super Bowl" is a Registered Mark - Don't Use in Commercials or Promotions Without Permission, and
David Oxenford does some Gazing Into </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6510350661509143834'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6510350661509143834'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/christo-transfer-taxes-super-bowl-and.html' title='Christo; transfer taxes; the Super Bowl; and Congress'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TQlZvhavgsI/AAAAAAAAA7o/YpFwboTfNmo/s72-c/Blogosphere.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6147864531911845259</id><published>2011-01-14T01:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-14T01:35:00.352-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Chinese copyright law on copyrights as collateral and music piracy</title><summary type='text'>The copyright law of China - which is still a relatively young thing - has  attracted recent attention (in print).Sheppard Mullin's Intellectual Property Law Blog features China Revamps Its Outdated Copyright Pledges System. The post briefly describes new China State Copyright Bureau rules that became effective January 1st, 2011, concerning the use of copyrights as security.
Duke University's </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6147864531911845259'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6147864531911845259'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/chinese-copyright-law-on-copyrights-as.html' title='Chinese copyright law on copyrights as collateral and music piracy'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6571213522650920216</id><published>2011-01-13T01:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-13T01:30:01.630-08:00</updated><title type='text'>U.S. movie production incentives extended</title><summary type='text'>The United States doesn't offer movie producers incentives as dramatic as those offered, say, in Canada. But section 181 of the Internal Revenue Code does provide producers with some benefits by allowing them to take certain deductions, under certain circumstances. Section 181 expired at the end of 2009. But Congress recently "extended" the section through the end of 2011. Why "extended" rather </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6571213522650920216'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6571213522650920216'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/us-movie-production-incentives-extended.html' title='U.S. movie production incentives extended'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6577741530381010129</id><published>2011-01-13T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-13T01:00:09.246-08:00</updated><title type='text'>EC approves News Corp's acquisition of BSkyB</title><summary type='text'>The European Commission has approved the acquisition of BSkyB by News Corp, after concluding that the $12 billion transaction will not affect competition in Europe. The Commission's action has been noted by Mayer Brown and by Paul Weiss. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6577741530381010129'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6577741530381010129'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/ec-approves-news-corps-acquisition-of.html' title='EC approves News Corp&apos;s acquisition of BSkyB'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8529787528877911129</id><published>2011-01-12T09:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-12T09:41:04.168-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Impact of digitization on entertainment lawyers</title><summary type='text'>Connecticut lawyer James Walker Jr. has written about the "extinction of the CD." In Digital Explosion Changes Landscape for Entertainment Lawyers, Walker - who is the author of This Business Of Urban Music -  observes thatWith declining sales and the rise of digital downloading through iTunes and other outlets, we soon may refer to the CD in the same manner as we do the audio cassette, 8-track </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8529787528877911129'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8529787528877911129'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/impact-of-digitization-on-entertainment.html' title='Impact of digitization on entertainment lawyers'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-8050316931624282705</id><published>2011-01-12T09:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-12T09:29:44.765-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Federal Communications Law Journal publishes new issue</title><summary type='text'>A new issue of the Federal Communications Law Journal is available online. Published by Indiana University law school and the Federal Bar Association, Volume 63 Number 1 contains these articles:

Essays from Time Warner Cable's Research Program on Digital CommunicationsThe  Challenge of Developing Effective Public Policy on the Use of Social Media by  Youth, by John Palfrey
The  Challenge of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8050316931624282705'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/8050316931624282705'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/federal-communications-law-journal.html' title='Federal Communications Law Journal publishes new issue'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-306584378824666325</id><published>2011-01-11T11:58:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-11T22:04:04.350-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Recent decisions: movie plagiarism cases involving "Stomp the Yard" and "Flushed Away"; Mattel vs Bratz dolls</title><summary type='text'>The current issue (1/5/11) of Loeb &amp; Loeb's IP/Entertainment Law Weekly Case Update reports on (and links to) three recent decisions by federal District Courts in California:
Clements v. Screen Gems, in which the court dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit, without trial, because the court found that Screen Gems' movie "Stomp the Yard" did not infringe the copyright to the plaintiff’s movie </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/306584378824666325'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/306584378824666325'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/current-issue-1511-of-loeb-loebs.html' title='Recent decisions: movie plagiarism cases involving &quot;Stomp the Yard&quot; and &quot;Flushed Away&quot;; Mattel vs Bratz dolls'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TOVuBg7l_QI/AAAAAAAAA0Q/zrh_eP_hYgI/s72-c/Loeb.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-5607387893104171446</id><published>2011-01-11T10:59:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-11T11:59:41.383-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Supreme Court denies cert in digital music price-fixing case</title><summary type='text'>The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Sony Music, Vivendi, Warner Music and EMI, in  Sony Music v. Starr. The case involves an antitrust claim by consumers who allege that the music companies illegally agreed with one another not to sell digital music for less than 70 cents per song. The case has not yet gone to trial. Rather, the record companies sought to have it </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5607387893104171446'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/5607387893104171446'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/supreme-court-denies-cert-in-digital.html' title='Supreme Court denies cert in digital music price-fixing case'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-6869384429702232619</id><published>2011-01-10T14:48:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-10T14:48:29.241-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Hot news" doctrine may be making a comeback</title><summary type='text'>In a post titled Careful, That News May Be Hot! Digital Era Heightens Interest in "Hot News" Protection, Goodwin Procter's David Young notes thatRecent court decisions and Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") proceedings demonstrate a reawakened interest in legal protection of "hot news" – not subject to copyright protection – where an online aggregator, blogger or other secondary content </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6869384429702232619'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/6869384429702232619'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/hot-news-doctrine-may-be-making.html' title='&quot;Hot news&quot; doctrine may be making a comeback'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TSuMEn_EHFI/AAAAAAAAA-g/EQCPDEQY1cs/s72-c/Goodwin-Procter-logo.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2686723755677615795</id><published>2011-01-10T12:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-10T12:31:18.007-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Facebook settlement of idea case</title><summary type='text'>Curious about the terms of the Facebook settlement with the founders of ConnectU - the idea misappropriation case that was at the heart of the movie "The Social Netword"? A post by Liz Gannes at All Things Digital links to briefs (in a follow-on case concerning the settlement) that reveal some details.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2686723755677615795'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2686723755677615795'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/facebook-settlement-of-idea-case.html' title='Facebook settlement of idea case'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-7157017651220352753</id><published>2011-01-07T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-07T01:00:02.364-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Title insurance for fine art</title><summary type='text'>Title insurance has been a routine requirement in real estate transactions forever (or at least as long as I can remember). Now title insurance is being used in fine art transactions too. Art Market Monitor interviewed Judith Pearson and Lawrence Shindell, the founders the art title insurance company, ARIS, on how this came about. An audio recording of the interview is available here.

Hat tip: </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7157017651220352753'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/7157017651220352753'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/title-insurance-for-fine-art.html' title='Title insurance for fine art'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-849219728618848804</id><published>2011-01-06T01:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-06T01:30:00.108-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Copyright reform in Canada</title><summary type='text'>Sara Bannerman - a Fulbright visiting scholar at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University and a post-doctoral fellow at the Centre for Governance of Knowledge and Development at the Australian National University - has contributed a chapter titled Copyright: Characteristics of Canadian Reform to the recently published book Canadian Copyright and The Digital </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/849219728618848804'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/849219728618848804'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/copyright-reform-in-canada.html' title='Copyright reform in Canada'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-3985800779762323190</id><published>2011-01-06T00:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-06T00:30:01.100-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Comic books, copyright, creativity . . . and law reviews</title><summary type='text'>UC Davis law professor Keith Aoki has made history (I think). His law review article Pictures within Pictures - to be published in the Ohio Northern Law Review - is, quite literally, a 14-page comic strip. He describes his creation as "a meditation on the creative process, copyright law, and comic book history."</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3985800779762323190'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/3985800779762323190'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/comic-books-copyright-creativity-and.html' title='Comic books, copyright, creativity . . . and law reviews'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-1899403281424859537</id><published>2011-01-05T03:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-13T19:15:52.476-08:00</updated><title type='text'>ABC defeats FCC in "NYPD Blue" indecency case</title><summary type='text'>David Oxenford, in the Davis Wright Tremaine Broadcast Law Blog, reports on (and links to) a Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision that has vacated a $27,500 fine the FCC had imposed on ABC to penalize the network for a pre-10 pm broadcast of "NYPD Blue" that showed a woman's naked buttocks for less than 7 seconds.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1899403281424859537'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/1899403281424859537'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/abc-defeats-fcc-in-nypd-blue-indecency_05.html' title='ABC defeats FCC in &quot;NYPD Blue&quot; indecency case'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TSPkGPnf31I/AAAAAAAAA-c/b89EI6PSDTE/s72-c/NYPD_Blue.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5642078431020621425.post-2596994369916467691</id><published>2011-01-05T02:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-05T08:38:36.348-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Top 10 sports law stories of 2010</title><summary type='text'>Dan Fitzgerald has posted the top 10 sports law stories of 2010 at his Connecticut Sports Law blog. For readers who may have forgotten the details (or for students looking for law review or seminar topics), his picks include links to past articles. Here is his lineup:The number 1 biggest story of the year.
Stories 2 through 5.
Stories 6 through 10.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2596994369916467691'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5642078431020621425/posts/default/2596994369916467691'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.entertainmentlawreporter.com/2011/01/top-10-sports-law-stories-of-2010.html' title='Top 10 sports law stories of 2010'/><author><name>Lon Sobel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08023475048025227994</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='26' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vXD97LrZ3Go/TNXi0uKYsXI/AAAAAAAAAqI/k2Zdc4mdBFQ/S220/Sobel.jpg'/></author></entry></feed>
